FRANKLIN
PUBLIC SCHOOLS
REDISTRICTING
PROJECT
PROJECT
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
5/8/02

Contents:
1. Redistricting Project Summary
|
|
a. Introduction |
|
|
b. Project Team |
|
|
c. Project Meeting Dates |
|
|
d. Project Mission Statement |
|
|
e. Project Principles |
|
|
f. Project Deliverables |
|
|
g. Project Time Line |
|
|
h. Project Resources |
|
|
i. Project Constraints |
2. Elementary Option 11d
|
|
a. Option 11d Recommendation |
|
|
b. How to read Option 11d Maps |
|
|
c. Redistricting Option 11d Description and Enrollment Forecast |
|
|
d. Option 11d Town-wide Map (North) |
|
|
e. Option 11d Town-wide Map (South) |
|
|
f. Option 11d Davis-Thayer District Map |
|
|
g. Option 11d, Jefferson District Map |
|
|
h. Option 11d, JFK District Map |
|
|
i. Option 11d, Keller District Map |
|
|
j. Option 11d, Oak Street District Map |
|
|
k. Option 11d, Parmenter District Map |
|
1. Redistricting Project Summary |
|
A. Introduction |
|
The overall goal of the redistricting project is to contribute to the district’s goal of providing all Franklin Public Schools students with the best physical learning environment possible by uniform and equitable utilization of facilities according to the needs of the educational program. |
|
Redistricting is a massive undertaking that will affect a great number employees, parents and students. Redistricting will effect all residents perhaps in very small ways and those residents who are our customers in very significant ways. Changing district boundary lines is accompanied by emotion and passion. This task is made more complex by accidents of geography, the locations of our schools, the street and neighborhood network that makes up the Franklin community and the geographic distribution of our students. Redistricting has a direct impact on school budgets, jobs and the education of every student. Redistricting is a daunting task. |
|
Redistricting is also a very necessary task. The Town of Franklin has responded to the extraordinary growth of Franklin’s school age population by initiating a massive school construction project. Table 1 displays the addition of 361,850 square feet of school house space over the past 6 years in the Town of Franklin. The acquisition of portables in 1998, 1999 and 2000 simply kept pace with district growth. Enrollment growth has been averaging 5 percent per year. The new schools will accommodate present growth and permit overcrowded existing schools to recapture valuable specialized spaces such as library, computer lab, art and music spaces and important meeting and storage spaces. |
|
Table
1 |
|||
|
Year |
Project |
# of Classrooms |
Square Feet |
|
September 1998 |
Portable Classrooms |
8 |
7,600 |
|
September 1999 |
Portable Classrooms |
10 |
9,500 |
|
September 2000 |
Portable Classrooms |
5 |
4,750 |
|
September 2002 |
Keller Elementary School Opening |
|
85,000 |
|
September 2003 |
Sullivan Middle School Opening |
|
85,000 |
|
September 2003 |
Horace Mann Middle School Reconstruction and Opening |
|
85,000 |
|
September 2003 |
New Oak St School Opening |
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
361,850 |
|
Redistricting is the altering of school
district boundary lines to achieve the desired end of efficient, effective
and equitable utilization of schoolhouse space and resources. Table 2
illustrates the present enrollment for each school as of October 1, 2001. |
|
Table
2 |
|
|
School |
Enrollment |
|
Davis Thayer |
411 |
|
Jefferson Elementary |
670 |
|
Keller Elementary |
0 |
|
J.F. Kennedy Elem. |
568 |
|
Oak St. School |
734 |
|
Parmenter School |
556 |
|
Horace Mann MS |
725 |
|
Remington MS |
590 |
|
Sullivan MS |
0 |
|
Franklin High School |
1219 |
|
|
5473 |
|
The goal for the Redistricting Team is to change school district boundary lines in a way that follows the principles and practices of good school management and achieves enrollment targets established for each building in the best possible way. The objective for the Redistricting Team is to reduce enrollment at each existing school, open the Keller School and prepare for the relocation of Oak St. and finally redistrict the middle schools. |
|
This document contains maps, statistical information and resources used by the team in reaching decisions with regard to redistricting. Using the materials contained in this manual and additional information and materials, the Team took the following work path: |
B. Project Team Members
|
Name |
Title |
|
Dr. Warren |
Superintendent |
|
Dr. Ann Bergen |
Principal |
|
Barbara Brunelli |
Parent |
|
Dave Keniston |
Business Manager |
|
Mike Konosky |
Principal |
|
Corinne Minkel |
Principal |
|
Maureen Sabolinski |
Special Education Dir. |
|
Lisa Bassignani |
Transportation Coord. |
|
Roberta Trahan |
Parent |
C. Project Meeting Dates
|
Meeting |
Date |
Time |
Place |
|
Team |
Jan. 4, 2002 |
9:00 AM |
397 East Central St. |
|
Team |
Jan. 24, 2002 |
9:00 AM |
397 East Central St. |
|
Public Hearing |
Jan. 28, 2002 |
7:30 AM |
Jefferson |
|
Public Hearing |
Jan. 29, 2002 |
7:30 AM |
Kennedy |
|
Public Hearing |
Jan. 31, 2002 |
9:30 AM |
TriCounty Regional |
|
Team |
Mar. 22, 2002 |
9:00 AM |
397 East Central St. |
|
Public Meeting |
April 2, 2002 |
7:00 PM |
Jefferson |
|
Public Meeting |
April 4, 2002 |
7:00 PM |
TriCounty Regional |
|
Public Meeting |
April 4, 2002 |
9:00 AM |
Keller School |
|
Team |
April 25, 2002 |
9:00 am |
397 East Central St. |
|
School Committee |
May 14 |
|
|
|
D. Project Mission Statement |
|
To create a new school boundary plan that will, to the extent possible, further the district’s goal of providing the best physical learning environment possible by uniform and equitable utilization of facilities according to the needs of the educational program. |
|
E. Project Principles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Every redistricting project must be guided by principles or rules. These rules are used to guide the district boundary designers in their decision-making and to provide equity in the redistricting product. The redistricting options reviewed by the Team were guided by the following project principles. These principles are presented in no particular order. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
A Note on Redistricting Principles |
|
The Team considered each of these principles as redistricting options were developed and boundary line changes were proposed. As the project progressed, we found that some of our guiding principles were contradictory or adverse to each other. For example, in our early boundary line models, we emphasized the "effect the fewest number of parents and students" principle. We found that this principle worked against promoting an "efficient system of school bus transportation" and "maximizing walking paths to school". We found it impossible to "impact the fewest number of students" and not create situations were students spent excessive time on the bus or passed one school to reach their destination school. |
|
F. Project Work Products and Deliverables |
|
The redistricting team project deliverables are as follows: |
|
G. Project Time Line |
|
The major milestones in the Franklin
Public Schools redistricting project are as follows: |
|
Date |
Milestone |
|
Week of Jan. 27, 2002 |
Three Public Hearings are held to present several redistricting concepts and listen to public comment. |
|
By Feb. 8,2002 |
Decisions will be made on new district boundaries. Boundaries are not announced until June 1, 2002. The work of changing staffing assignments begins. |
|
Feb. 26, 2002 |
Horace Mann Middle School moves to the Sullivan Middle School intact and exists at Sullivan as the HM until 9/03 |
|
Apr.2,4, 2002 |
Three Public Meetings are held to present Option 11d |
|
June 1, 2002 |
The redistricting plan is announced, staffing changes are published, student assignments are issued by letter. |
|
June 30, 2002 |
ECDC relocates. |
|
Aug. 25, 2002 |
The Keller Elementary School opens. Elementary redistricting is implemented. All district boundaries are effected. The Oak Street Elementary continues to exist at FHS with reduced enrollment. FHS gains needed space at Oak St., all elementary schools benefit from reduced enrollment and restored special use spaces such as art, music, library, computer and science labs. Storage and meeting spaces are restored. |
|
Feb. 2003 |
The Oak St. School moves from FHS to the new Oak St. Elementary School. The HS gains complete access to A and D wings. |
|
Aug. 25, 2003 |
Middle School redistricting is implemented. All MS district boundaries are effected creating a new Sullivan Middle School district. All middle schools benefit from reduced enrollment and restored special use spaces such as art, music, library, and computer and science labs. Storage and meeting spaces are restored. |
|
Aug 25, 2003 or sooner |
ECDC opens in new space designed for early childhood education and has room to grow. |
H. Project Resources
|
|
People Resources |
|
|
Project Team Members |
|
|
Town Planning Department |
|
|
Town Building Department |
|
|
Town Clerk |
|
|
Massachusetts Department of Education |
|
|
Metropolitan Area Planning Council |
|
|
NESDEC |
|
|
Other Districts who have been through redistricting |
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Resources |
|
|
GIS Technology owned by the district |
|
|
Presentation Technology owned by the district |
|
|
NESDEC |
|
|
U.S. Census Data |
|
|
Outside consultants |
|
I. Project Constraints |
|
Time |
|
School budget development for FY 2003 depends on completion of the redistricting plan. The plan must be reviewed, discussed and accepted as early as possible to have an impact on FY 2003 budget development. |
|
Geography |
|
As Team members review and discuss redistricting options, the constraints of the Town’s geography become apparent. Factors such as the Town’s natural barriers (Rte. 495, Rte. 140, Commuter Rail Line), the existing road network, the placement of schools and the distribution of student populations come into play. There can be no perfect redistricting plan that satisfies all of the principles of redistricting. The best plan will be an accommodation respecting the geography of the Town and the educational goals of the school district. |
|
2. Elementary Option 11d |
|
A. Option 11d Recommendation |
|
B. How to Read the Option 11d Maps |
|
|
The Option 11d maps feature several map layers. These layers include: |
|
|
|
Students - Each dot represents one or more students at a known address. All student information comes from the district’s student information system as of 5/2/02. Large scale maps (District Maps), feature only one district. The student dots on these maps display three characters showing the pre-redistricting (9/01) school for that address. |
|
|
Street Network - The source for the Franklin street network is "U.S. Streets". This is a street map maintained by the United States Government. Street names are provided. The last update to the map was the 2000 Census. Streets not included in the U.S. Streets map are added by hand by Franklin personnel. |
|
|
Schools - School locations are indicated in bold, black type and have a school house symbol. |
|
|
District Lines - Heavy blue lines indicate new district lines. |
|
|
North/South Maps - The map of Franklin is printed in two sections to provide adequate resolution for the reader. |
|
|
District Maps - Larger scale, individual district maps are also displayed. |
|
The redistricting recommendation, Option 11d maps and supporting materials follow: |
|
Redistricting Option 11d Enrollment Forecast and Analysis |
|
Option 11 d features good balance at all schools. Total enrollments are below targets at all schools except Keller. Note enrollment is forecast to decline at Keller in 2003. Maximum effort was made to create a "school centric" boundary plan. This results in maximum use of walking paths to school and minimum time on the bus where transportation is required. Four in ten students are moved to a new school in Option 11d. |
|
September 2002, Enrollment by Grade per Option 11d |
|||||||
|
Grd |
DT |
JEF |
JFK |
OAK |
PAR |
KEL |
Total |
|
K |
56 |
101 |
86 |
95 |
57 |
76 |
471 |
|
1 |
62 |
99 |
90 |
79 |
78 |
95 |
503 |
|
2 |
64 |
105 |
95 |
96 |
91 |
100 |
551 |
|
3 |
50 |
82 |
94 |
84 |
73 |
89 |
472 |
|
4 |
58 |
83 |
89 |
96 |
59 |
98 |
483 |
|
5 |
43 |
91 |
84 |
88 |
75 |
92 |
473 |
|
Total |
333 |
561 |
538 |
538 |
433 |
550 |
2953 |
|
Target |
362 |
572 |
568 |
572 |
444 |
512 |
3030 |
|
Diff |
-29 |
-11 |
-30 |
-34 |
-11 |
38 |
-77 |
|
September 2003, Enrollment by Grade per Option 11d |
|||||||
|
Grd |
DT |
JEF |
JFK |
OAK |
PAR |
KEL |
Total |
|
K |
56 |
101 |
86 |
95 |
57 |
76 |
471 |
|
1 |
56 |
101 |
86 |
95 |
57 |
76 |
471 |
|
2 |
62 |
99 |
90 |
79 |
78 |
95 |
503 |
|
3 |
64 |
105 |
95 |
96 |
91 |
100 |
551 |
|
4 |
50 |
82 |
94 |
84 |
73 |
89 |
472 |
|
5 |
58 |
83 |
89 |
96 |
59 |
98 |
483 |
|
Total |
346 |
571 |
540 |
545 |
449 |
534 |
2985 |
|
Target |
362 |
572 |
568 |
572 |
444 |
512 |
3030 |
|
Diff |
-16 |
-1 |
-28 |
-27 |
5 |
22 |
-45 |
|
Option Enrollment and Demographic Highlights, Sept. 2002: |
|||||||
|
Sch |
AreaSqMi |
Enrl 9/02 |
Target 9/02 |
Dif / Target |
#Riders |
#Walkers |
%Walkers |
|
DT |
1.71 |
333 |
362 |
-29 |
59 |
279 |
82.5% |
|
JEF |
9.19 |
561 |
572 |
-11 |
149 |
406 |
73.2% |
|
JFK |
3.38 |
538 |
568 |
-30 |
44 |
509 |
92.0% |
|
OAK |
5.28 |
538 |
572 |
-34 |
155 |
356 |
69.7% |
|
PAR |
3.62 |
433 |
444 |
-11 |
106 |
345 |
76.5% |
|
KEL |
3.87 |
550 |
512 |
38 |
123 |
422 |
77.4% |
|
TOT |
27.05 |
2953 |
3030 |
-77 |
636 |
2317 |
2953 |
|
Home District/Sending District Analysis |
||||||||||
|
Sch |
TotHomeDist |
#DT |
#Jef |
#JFK |
#Oak |
#Par |
TotOthrDist |
Total School |
%HmDist |
%OthrDist |
|
DT |
189 |
X |
0 |
0 |
0 |
144 |
144 |
333 |
56.76% |
43.24% |
|
JEF |
559 |
0 |
X |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
561 |
99.64% |
0.36% |
|
JFK |
501 |
0 |
0 |
X |
33 |
4 |
37 |
538 |
93.12% |
6.88% |
|
OAK |
198 |
179 |
46 |
74 |
X |
41 |
340 |
538 |
36.80% |
63.20% |
|
PAR |
350 |
1 |
82 |
0 |
0 |
X |
83 |
433 |
80.83% |
19.17% |
|
KEL |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
501 |
19 |
550 |
550 |
0.00% |
100.00% |
|
TOT |
1797 |
210 |
128 |
74 |
536 |
208 |
1156 |
2953 |
60.85% |
39.15% |
|
|
"Students 9/2002 by Grade and Prior School" report is attached. This report displays students at each school as of 9/2002, by grade and prior school. |
|
Sch/9/2002 |
FPS Students by Grade and Sending School Per Option 11b, 9/2002 |
|||||||
|
|
From School/ |
K |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
|
Davis-Thayer |
||||||||
|
|
DT |
32 |
35 |
39 |
31 |
29 |
23 |
189 |
|
|
PAR |
24 |
27 |
25 |
19 |
29 |
20 |
144 |
|
|
TOTAL - DT |
56 |
62 |
64 |
50 |
58 |
43 |
333 |
|
Jefferson |
||||||||
|
|
JEF |
101 |
99 |
105 |
82 |
83 |
89 |
559 |
|
|
OAK |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
TOTAL - JEF |
101 |
99 |
105 |
82 |
83 |
91 |
561 |
|
Kennedy |
||||||||
|
|
JFK |
80 |
86 |
87 |
86 |
82 |
80 |
501 |
|
|
OAK |
6 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
33 |
|
|
PAR |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
TOTAL - JFK |
86 |
90 |
95 |
94 |
89 |
84 |
538 |
|
Keller |
||||||||
|
|
DT |
7 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
30 |
|
|
OAK |
65 |
87 |
92 |
82 |
92 |
83 |
501 |
|
|
PAR |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
19 |
|
|
TOTAL - DT |
76 |
95 |
100 |
89 |
98 |
92 |
550 |
|
Oak |
||||||||
|
|
DT |
33 |
29 |
32 |
33 |
29 |
23 |
179 |
|
|
JEF |
4 |
8 |
12 |
6 |
7 |
9 |
46 |
|
|
JFK |
16 |
7 |
15 |
9 |
14 |
13 |
74 |
|
|
OAK |
33 |
29 |
29 |
33 |
37 |
37 |
198 |
|
|
PAR |
9 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
9 |
6 |
41 |
|
|
TOTAL - OAK |
95 |
79 |
96 |
84 |
96 |
88 |
538 |
|
Parmenter |
||||||||
|
|
DT |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
JEF |
13 |
16 |
15 |
12 |
9 |
17 |
82 |
|
|
PAR |
44 |
62 |
75 |
61 |
50 |
58 |
350 |
|
|
TOTAL - PAR |
57 |
78 |
91 |
73 |
59 |
75 |
433 |
|
Grand Total |
|
471 |
503 |
551 |
472 |
483 |
473 |
2953 |
|
Map Links |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|